Join Us
Looking for Something to Do? Call Your Buddy connects people and events around the world.

Looking back in Siege's development, singleplayer was sidestepped by you guys . Is there any regrets on that front?

I think there is OSRS gold always room for whatever you choose and anything you want. But in the event of Runescape gold Siege, developing a game that needs so much depth and so many systems means you have to focus all your attention and all of your might to want that end goal. The second that you begin to divide your intention and focus in two different instructions, you stand a chance of sabotaging your end goal or you might create friction between the two. Sooner or later, it is inevitable another will be overtaken by among those 2 facets.

From the beginning, we were adamant we desired to construct a multiplayer. We knew that not growing singleplayer also guaranteed us to place 100 percent of our focus into multiplayer fail if we didn't succeed. There was a sense of: there was no safety net, and best site to buy osrs gold we wanted so much that we were eager to place all our eggs into precisely the same basket. Then Siege as we all understand it would have failed, if we had neglected.

Someone might have taken it on at that stage, and they'd likely have done anything different.

Was it hard to convince Ubisoft you n't went the singleplayer route down ?